[ad_1]
New Delhi29 minutes ago
- Copy of Link
The microblogging platform X (East Twitter) on Tuesday claimed that the Indian government had ordered to block more than 2,300 accounts on July 3. The order also includes the official handle of the Global News Agency Reuters.
X’s Global Government Affairs team says in a post that the Government of India has ordered that all these accounts be blocked under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act.
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MET) has asked to follow the order within an hour without giving any reason and the accounts to keep the accounts indefinitely block.
Withdrawal
According to X, after people’s protests, the government on Sunday requested to unlock the accounts of Reuters ( @Rooter and @Ruter World). These accounts were blocked by users in India on Sunday, but were later recovered on the same day.
X expressed concern over the press censorship in India that it was considered all the legal options. However, under the Indian law, X is hindered by legal challenges against this official order. The company has appealed to the affected users to find legal action through the court.
Minister’s Reply: No new order has been given
On the other hand, Mity X’s claim rejected that no new blocking order was issued on July 3. The ministry has claimed that as soon as Reuters’ accounts were blocked, it claimed to recover the accounts from July 5 in continuous contact with X.
The ministry has said that X technical reasons have been delayed by quoting and unlocked only Retters and other URLs after 9th AM, which took more than 21 hours.
X has filed a case against the government
The Karnataka High Court has filed a lawsuit against the Indian government challenging the blockade order issued under the X Information Technology Act 2000. The company has said that these orders do not have adequate security system. The case was heard on Tuesday.
X has demanded amendments to his petition filed in March, demanding the cancellation of the Rule 3 (1) (D) of the X information technology control. This rule gives government agencies to order intermediaries (eg x) to order the removal of content.
Has before there has been disputes between X and the government
This is not the first that there has been any conflict between the government of X and India. In May this year, the Handle of the Global Government Affairs team of X was blocked in India, which was unlocked one day later. At that time, the government issued an order to block the account.
The basis of legal dispute
X’s petition states that Section 799 (3) (b) does not give the government the right to block the intermediaries. This department has asked the intermediaries to remove the legal concession. If they do not follow the government’s texdown order.
In collaboration with the Rule 3 (1) (D) of the Act -2021, it allows the government to remove the content of the Information Technology (Salis Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code).
[ad_2]
Source link
